Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 36: 411-418, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331030

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the susceptibility of globally pneumonia-causing meropenem-resistant (MEM-R) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates against important antibiotics and estimate appropriate dosages of indicated antibiotics. METHODS: We extracted the 2014-2021 Antimicrobial Testing of Leadership Surveillance database regarding the susceptibility of MEM-R A. baumannii isolates causing pneumonia against important antibiotics. The susceptibility and carbapenemase-encoding gene (CPEG) data of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates from patients hospitalized in intensive care units of five major regions were analyzed. The susceptibility breakpoints (SBP) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2022, other necessary criteria [SBP of MIC for colistin, 2 mg/L, in the CLSI 2018; and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL), 16 mg/L], and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of indicated antibiotics were employed. RESULTS: Applying the aforementioned criteria, we observed the susceptible rates of colistin, minocycline, and CFP-SUL against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates globally (n = 2905) were 93.2%, 69.1%, and 26.3%, respectively. Minocycline was significantly more active in vitro (MIC ≤4 mg/L) against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates collected from North and South America compared to those from other regions (>90% vs. 58-72%). Additionally, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 were the predominant CPEG in pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: After deliberative estimations, dosages of 200 mg minocycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 8 mg/L), 100 mg tigecycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 1 mg/L), and 160 mg nebulized colistin methanesulphonate every 8 h (SBP, 2 mg/L) are needed for the effective treatment of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Infecciosos , Pneumonia , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Meropeném/farmacologia , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Minociclina/farmacologia , Colistina/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Liderança , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico
2.
J Med Virol ; 95(2): e28426, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36571257

RESUMO

Following the rapidly increasing number of multisystem inflammatory syndromes in children (MIS-C), a similar clinical scenario has been observed in adult patients. Although its prevalence is low and probably related to underdiagnosis, its development can be associated with high mortality. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) can develop following both asymptomatic and symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and in previously healthy people. Like MIS-C, MIS-A is a multisystem disease that can involve the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, hematologic, and neurologic systems. In addition to the clinical manifestations, the diagnosis of MIS-A requires laboratory evidence of inflammation and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The appropriate treatment for MIS-A remains unclear; anti-inflammatory agents, including intravenous immunoglobulin and corticosteroids, are commonly used. However, there are still many unknowns regarding MIS-A. Further studies are needed to determine the true prevalence, pathogenesis, and effective treatment for MIS-A.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica
3.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 24: 376-382, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596476

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases as well as the clinical trials registries of ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched up to 8 November 2020. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the treatment efficacy of cefiderocol with that of other antibiotics for adult patients with acute bacterial infections were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome was clinical response at test of cure (TOC). RESULTS: Three RCTs, including one phase 2 and two phase 3 trials, were included. No significant difference in clinical response rate was observed between cefiderocol and comparators [odds ratio (OR)=1.04]. In a subgroup analysis, no significant difference was observed in the clinical response at TOC between cefiderocol and comparators in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (OR=0.92) or complicated urinary tract infection (OR=1.28). In addition, all-cause mortality at Days 14 and 28 did not differ between the cefiderocol and control groups (14-day mortality, OR=1.25; 28-day mortality, OR=1.12). Furthermore, cefiderocol was associated with similar microbiological response to comparators at the TOC assessment (OR=1.44). Finally, cefiderocol was associated with a similar risk of adverse events as comparators. CONCLUSION: Cefiderocol can achieve similar clinical and microbiological responses as comparators for patients with serious bacterial infections. In addition, cefiderocol shares a safety profile similar to that of comparators.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Cefalosporinas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Front Microbiol ; 11: 1967, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32973713

RESUMO

From January 2013 to December 2018, 90 Escherichia coli isolates were collected from 90 sick pigs on 58 farms in seven cities in Taiwan. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the isolates to 14 antimicrobial agents were determined on the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France), and the resistance to colistin was assessed via the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method. The mobilized colistin resistance genes (mcr) were determined for the colistin-resistant isolates, which displayed BMD MICs ≥ 4 mg/L. Genotypes of the mcr-positive E. coli isolates were determined by multilocus sequence typing, arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. All of the isolates were tested for susceptibility to carbapenems. Fifty isolates (55.6%) were resistant to colistin, 39 of which (78%) were positive for the mcr-1 gene. E. coli isolates harboring mcr-1 were most frequent in 2017 (15/18, 83.3%), followed by 2018 (13/23, 56.5%), 2015 (7/21, 33.3%), and 2016 (3/24, 12.5%). A total of 18 sequence types (STs) were identified among the 39 porcine mcr-1-carrying E. coli isolates; 13 were ST2521 (33.3%) isolated in 2017 and 2018. Five genotypes (clones) were identified, and the same genotypes were in sick pigs on the same farm and different farms. This suggests intra- and inter-farm spread of porcine mcr-1-carrying E. coli. The results presented here indicate high colistin resistance and wide mcr-1 E. coli prevalence among the sick pigs sampled in 2015-2018 in different regions of Taiwan.

5.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(4): 105946, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199877

RESUMO

It has been 2 months since the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was reported in Wuhan, China. So far, COVID-19 has affected 85 403 patients in 57 countries/territories and has caused 2924 deaths in 9 countries. However, epidemiological data differ between countries. Although China had higher morbidity and mortality than other sites, the number of new daily cases in China has been lower than outside of China since 26 February 2020. The incidence ranged from 61.44 per 1 000 000 people in the Republic of Korea to 0.0002 per 1 000 000 people in India. The daily cumulative index (DCI) of COVID-19 (cumulative cases/no. of days between the first reported case and 29 February 2020) was greatest in China (1320.85), followed by the Republic of Korea (78.78), Iran (43.11) and Italy (30.62). However, the DCIs in other countries/territories were <10 per day. Several effective measures including restricting travel from China, controlling the distribution of masks, extensive investigation of COVID-19 spread, and once-daily press conferences by the government to inform and educate people were aggressively conducted in Taiwan. This is probably the reason why there was only 39 cases (as of 29 February 2020) with a DCI of 1 case per day in Taiwan, which is much lower than that of nearby countries such as the Republic of Korea and Japan. In addition, the incidence and mortality were correlated with the DCI. However, further study and continued monitoring are needed to better understand the underlying mechanism of COVID-19.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/economia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Geografia Médica , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Índia/epidemiologia , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Japão/epidemiologia , Pandemias/economia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/economia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwan/epidemiologia
6.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 53(3): 404-412, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32173241

RESUMO

Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (formerly known as the 2019 novel coronavirus [2019-nCoV]) in Wuhan, China in December 2019, which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), more than 75,000 cases have been reported in 32 countries/regions, resulting in more than 2000 deaths worldwide. Despite the fact that most COVID-19 cases and mortalities were reported in China, the WHO has declared this outbreak as the sixth public health emergency of international concern. The COVID-19 can present as an asymptomatic carrier state, acute respiratory disease, and pneumonia. Adults represent the population with the highest infection rate; however, neonates, children, and elderly patients can also be infected by SARS-CoV-2. In addition, nosocomial infection of hospitalized patients and healthcare workers, and viral transmission from asymptomatic carriers are possible. The most common finding on chest imaging among patients with pneumonia was ground-glass opacity with bilateral involvement. Severe cases are more likely to be older patients with underlying comorbidities compared to mild cases. Indeed, age and disease severity may be correlated with the outcomes of COVID-19. To date, effective treatment is lacking; however, clinical trials investigating the efficacy of several agents, including remdesivir and chloroquine, are underway in China. Currently, effective infection control intervention is the only way to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China/epidemiologia , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/patologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 53(6): 916-924, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32094073

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Early identification of pathogens causing bloodstream infection (BSI) is critical for prompt administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: We used an in-house saponin-based extraction method to evaluate the performance of Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS system (MALDI Biotyper) for bacterial and fungal identification in 2013 positively-flagged VersaTREK blood culture bottles. RESULTS: A total of 180 monomicrobial and 23 polymicrobial positive blood cultures were investigated. Among monomicrobial positive blood cultures, the MALDI Biotyper recognized 90.6% and 81.7% of organisms directly from the flagged blood culture bottles to the genus and species levels, respectively. The MALDI Biotyper also correctly characterized one of the polymicrobial organisms to the species level in 20 (87%) bottles and to the genus level in 21 (91.3%) bottles. The overall identification rate using our protocol was 90.6% (184/203) and 82.3% (167/203) for genus and species levels, respectively. Identification accuracy was higher for Gram-positive than Gram-negative organisms and was the lowest for yeasts. Score values of identification were ≥1.500 for 200 (98.5%) bottles, ≥1.700 for 195 (96.1%) bottles and ≥2.000 for 182 (89.7%) bottles. Moreover, 83.5% and 92% of the isolates were identified precisely to species and genus level with the lower cutoff score of 1.500. Using our protocol also helped identifying BSI pathogens 18-24 h earlier compared to the sub-cultured colonies. CONCLUSION: Using Bruker MALDI Biotyper for identification of isolates directly from positive VersaTREK blood culture bottles, our in-house saponin-based protocol provided a more rapid turn-around time for correct identification of BSI pathogens than the conventional methods.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Fungemia/microbiologia , Fungos/isolamento & purificação , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Bacteriemia/sangue , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bactérias/classificação , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Hemocultura , Criança , Feminino , Fungemia/sangue , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Fungos/química , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Tipagem Micológica , Saponinas/química
11.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 74(2): 380-386, 2019 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30357343

RESUMO

Objectives: We investigated the in vitro activities of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and other related drugs against imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates. Methods: Non-duplicated bacteraemia isolates (n = 300) of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (n = 100), imipenem-resistant A. baumannii (n = 100) and S. maltophilia (n = 100) were evaluated. Imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates were defined as isolates exhibiting imipenem MIC ≥8 mg/L, as determined using the VITEK 2 system. The MICs of 11 other antimicrobial agents for the isolates were determined by the broth microdilution method. Iron-depleted CAMHB was used to determine the MICs of cefiderocol. Results: The rates of colistin resistance of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii were 5% and 10%, respectively. The MIC90 values of cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, tigecycline and colistin were as follows: imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa: 1, 4, 16, >4 and 2 mg/L; imipenem-resistant A. baumannii: 8, >64, >64, 4 and 2 mg/L; and S. maltophilia: 0.25, >64, >64, 2 and >8 mg/L, respectively. For imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, the MICs of cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were ≤4 mg/L for 88%, 8% and 1% of the isolates, respectively. Cefiderocol MICs were ≤4 mg/L for the five colistin-resistant imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates and 70% of the 10 colistin-resistant imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates. Conclusions: Cefiderocol exhibited more potent in vitro activity than ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, imipenem-resistant A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Imipenem/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Taiwan , Tazobactam/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...